Can the USA Be a Trustworthy Partner for Peace in the Middle East?

The United States, as the world’s largest producer and exporter of weapons, faces an inherent contradiction in promoting peace and stability. Since 2012, America’s military engagements—primarily in the Middle East and parts of Asia—have cost US taxpayers a staggering $6.4 trillion, according to Brown University. These conflicts have claimed the lives of over 800,000 people in Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Syria while displacing more than 35 million civilians. The toll on American soldiers is also significant, with approximately 15,000 lives lost.

In the Middle East, the US military footprint is vast, with bases spread across nearly every Persian Gulf country: seven in Oman, three in the UAE, eleven in Saudi Arabia, seven in Qatar, twelve in Bahrain, ten in Kuwait, and six each in Iraq and Syria. Beyond the Middle East, American military bases extend to numerous locations in Africa, including Libya, Tunisia, Djibouti, and Kenya.

Arms sales further highlight this militarized approach. In 2023, the United States achieved a record $238 billion in foreign arms sales—a 16% increase from 2022. With an annual defense budget nearing $1 trillion, the US operates the largest military force in human history, with over 800 bases spread across 80 countries.

Contrast this with China’s approach: over the past two decades, Beijing has invested $180 billion in infrastructure projects across Africa, including $22 billion in 2023 alone. While the US exports military hardware, China prioritizes economic development and sustainable growth.

To foster lasting peace in the Middle East and Africa, the US must reconsider its priorities. Diplomacy, economic investments, and development initiatives should take precedence over military training and base expansion. Furthermore, adopting a balanced stance in mediating between Israel, the Palestinians, and neighboring states is crucial.

A significant military presence often perpetuates conflict rather than resolving it. Without meaningful policy shifts, the current approach risks fueling further violence and instability. US policymakers must reassess their strategies and embrace policies that prioritize peacebuilding in Libya, Syria, and throughout the region.

Leave a Comment